« playing hard(er)ball | Main | weekend arts & leisure – like, the meaning of life, y’know? »

November 18, 2005

you could put an eye out that way

An organization called “W.A.T.C.H.,” (World Against Toys Causing Harm) has made many alarming discoveries since its founding not the least of which is that all the really good acronyms have already been taken.

But beyond that, W.A.T.C.H. each year around this time lists its “10 Worst Toys,” those toys that the organization believes are dangerous and could cause injury.

This year’s list includes such death traps as “Baby Serena” which comes with accessories, which, when disassembled, become smaller than they were and thus potential choking hazards. Our own investigation revealed that Baby Serena can also be cut up into even smaller pieces creating no fewer than 100 additional choking hazards meaning that one seemingly innocent Baby Serena is a veritable “Plaything of Mass Destruction” with the potential of taking out an entire preschool of oral age toddlers.

Also on the list is a Lord of the Rings crossbow set which hurls soft-tipped arrows at what W.A.T.C.H. describes as “high velocity.” It should be noted that any toy that has a projectile of any kind is described by W.A.T.C.H. as being “high velocity.” Do not be surprised if next year’s list includes Spongebob Squarepants Touchable Bubbles capable of launching spheres of potentially eye-stinging soapy concoctions at HIGH VELOCITY! 

Fantastic Four Thing Hands, which are big foam hands, made the list as well for their potential to cause “blunt impact injuries.” Better to use your bare fists to whale on your brother like you were planning to do.

In addition to the top 10 list, W.A.T.C.H. also has a “Watch Out” list of things to always be on the lookout for such as toys for children under 8 that use batteries as they may overheat and explode. If you’re 9, no problem, the occasional battery explosion is to be expected and builds character. But if you’re 8 and you are caught in a D-cell conflagration, well, let’s just say someone is going to be short a flash card partner in math class that day.

Also on the Watch Out list are realistic-looking toy weapons like guns as they might “promote violence.” As any parent will tell you, in the absence of these violence-promoting toys, adolescent boys will revert to a more natural state of beating each other over the head with sticks.

W.A.T.C.H. was founded by Edward M. Swartz, a trial lawyer with a heart of gold (primarily because he can afford one). Swartz is described as having “fearlessly” exposed potentially dangerous toys. Fearless is right. Let’s just say you do not want to get on the wrong side of Barbie. She has friends you know. His first book came out in 1971, “Toys That Don’t Care” and was followed up in 1986 by “Toys That Kill.” The working title of Mr. Swartz’s next book, “Toys That Ruin Your Credit Rating and Accidentally Let the Dog Out” suggests he may be mellowing somewhat.

The discussion of all these childhood dangers brought back some of our own memories, such as jumping off things “to see what happened.” Eventually something happened that suggested it was time to pursue some other recreational activity. These included hurling rock-studded dirt bombs at dear friends standing feet away and building impenetrable barriers of logs and sticks on dirt paths and then ramming bikes into them as if to prove the point.

But, thank God, at least we were not subjected to large foam hands, soft-tipped arrows, ubiquitous choking hazards (some disassembly required) and randomly detonating batteries. But, on the plus side, today you can sue toy companies.

You couldn’t sue dirt.

J.

Bookmark and Share

November 18, 2005 at 12:01 PM in Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1dc69e200d834243d8353ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference you could put an eye out that way:

» It's Christmas Time - Time to Make That Extra Effort to Consider the Safety of our Loved Ones from One-Sixteenth
We parents know that danger lurks behind every corner. Every step our children take could end in injury. Every toy they play with is fraught with potential hidden dangers. Thankfully, trained experts work hard to find these dangers before we... [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 20, 2005 1:18:57 AM

Comments

Haha, thats good stuff. :) Reminds me of that old SNL skit with Dan Aykroyd and his "bag of glass" - classic.

Posted by: Matt | Nov 19, 2005 4:36:10 AM

Lol, I still have the scar from one of those rock studded dirt balls. It's ok tho I got the guy back with a flaming tennis ball cannon a few years later.

Posted by: SkyWatch | Nov 19, 2005 10:16:39 AM

Here is a copy of my eMail to W.A.T.CH.:

Wow, thank you so very much for posting [this warning(link to LotR toy warning)] on your site. My son is fascinated with bows and arrows and crossbows and we have been searching for some toy appropriate for him.
The manufacturer's warning not to aim at eyes or faces sounds good, but that would require constant supervision by a careful parent, wouldn't it? Who has time for that?
In any case, I can say that our search for an appropriate toy is now over. I cannot imagine that anyone could make a toy bow and arrow set that could safely be aimed at another child's face.

Thanks again, and, also, thank you so much for telling us that we can find this long awaited toy at Toys-R-Us! You have saved us a great deal of searching.

In seriousness, perhaps what you should be advocating is good parenting and reliance on common sense. Grow up. Your sham of concern for childrens' safety is a thinly veiled grab for other people's money and time. Any fool who gives this toy to their child and does not pay attention to what their child does with it is not fit to drive their own car, much less raise a child.

Of course, if parents were responsible and used common sense in raising their children you would not have anyone to sue for insane amounts of money for producing a product that they believe children may enjoy.

Sincerely,

Kelly

Posted by: Kelly | Nov 26, 2005 8:18:23 PM

Post a comment