« May 2007 | Main | July 2007 »
June 28, 2007
being allowed to yell “fire” in a crowded election
In a dangerous precedent with far-reaching implications, the Supreme Court this week vastly expanded the free-speech rights encompassed under the Constitution to include not only the expression of opinions (which is bad enough), but the expression of opinions that might influence voters before an election.
That’s right, before an election, when it can still do the most harm. Surely this is a Supreme Court run out of control.
Prior to this ruling, the airing of opinions by advocacy groups regarding where candidates for political office stood on the important issues of the day were carefully restricted by the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law in an effort to ensure that the electorate was not unnecessarily confronted with ideas that might seem strange and unfamiliar. The prohibition on such ads running within 60 days prior to an election was thought to provide ample enough time for an attractive young white woman to go missing somewhere, the better to help voters forget about the potentially disruptive viewpoints.
With this decision now in place, we face an uncertain future in which people are free to express any opinion they want, whenever they want, much like a pack of wild animals. Senator John McCain, co-author of the law, pointed out that groups will now be able “to target a federal candidate in the days and weeks before an election.”
Days and weeks! What are the chances that an attractive white woman will go missing just days before an election? What if Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan decide to go out in public wearing panties and then turn in early for a good night’s sleep? What will cable news cover then?
Only chaos can ensue. In fact it is quite possible that we are facing a future in which incumbents will fail to be returned to office year after year the way our Founding Fathers had always intended.
Naturally, the decision was widely derided: "This is a big win for big money," said League of Women Voters President Mary G. Wilson, “Chief Justice Roberts has reopened the door to corruption."
Which clearly had been slammed shut with this law.
With these safeguards removed, “special interests” will
now be able to air ads naming specific candidates right up to the day of the
election. And just who are these nefarious
special interests attempting to wreak havoc with our electoral process? Unions, environmental groups, gun-rights
enthusiasts, pro-life organizations, civil rights groups…
In other words: You.
And do you really feel qualified to band together with
like-minded citizens to fund ads in support of candidates you favor? Don’t you think that’s a little selfish,
particularly when we have highly experienced professional politicians to handle
all that complicated governing stuff for you already? As Ellen Miller, a long-time supporter of
campaign-finance laws, put it, the ruling “could take the outcome of the
elections out of the hands of the candidates.”
Think about that. Elections taken out of the hands of experienced candidates and placed
into the grungy calloused hands of the masses.
So much for getting a good night’s sleep.
But it is not hopeless. You, as a concerned citizen, can refuse to take part in the coming melee of opinion mongering by adhering to the spirit of the original regulations and in so doing raise your hand as Lady Liberty has done all these years and ask yourself the questions that once stirred a nation to cast off the yoke of oppression:
- Is what I am saying the functional equivalent of express advocacy?
- Will I be party to the corrosive and distorting effects of immense aggregations of wealth?
- Is the statutory standard I am applying impermissibly vague?
Don’t be embarrassed. We get goosebumps thinking about it too.
J.
June 28, 2007 at 12:06 PM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
June 22, 2007
cleaning out my father’s basement part 1
There was a point in my life, not too long ago, when I pretty much still owned everything I had ever owned, from grade-school lunch boxes to college history notes to grunge-era flannel shirts. Does that make me a pack rat? Maybe. Emotionally immature? Perhaps. Desperate to cling to the comfortable certainties of an over-romanticized past rather than deal with the unsettling notion of an unknowable future? Possibly. A sad, pathetic commentary on… wait, where was I going with this?
Oh yeah, short of purchasing another house just to store my stuff (I did work the numbers) I’ve had to start throwing things out. Currently my most pressing mission is to help clean out my father’s basement before he sells the house.
I arrived on a sunny Friday, a little before 6PM. My father had left me a note: “Call as soon as you get in!” with an unfamiliar number written underneath. The exclamation point meant one of two things as far as I was concerned: The hospital or the morgue. Okay, so the morgue seemed unlikely since he had written the note but still, that would have been some impressive foresight.
The number got me the answering machine of his fiancé and I remembered they were out having dinner with some friends. It still being early I could have plunged into the dark basement and started working but I like to think of myself as a live-in-the-moment carpe diem kind of guy (which sounds way better than a self-centered narcissistic jerk kind of guy) so I went to the refrigerator in the garage and grabbed a very very bad Michelob Ultra. My brother had purchased a case of this unfortunate brew a couple of trips ago in a moment of madness and we’ve been choking it down ever since. (It’s a moral obligation I explained to my father later.)
I brought a chair out to the back patio, lit a cigar and
opened up “A Farewell to Arms” having gotten on a Hemingway kick after finding a
copy of “The Sun Also Rises” on my first trip to the basement a month
earlier. I then spent the remaining
daylight hours immersed in the tale of an American officer serving in the
Italian army during The Great War, my reading interrupted only by occasional
gagging fits as I worked my way through the detestable Michelob.
I should point out here that in order to fully appreciate
the motivations driving the characters in a Hemingway novel (if not the author
himself) it is important that one consumes alcohol in quantities commensurate
with the historical context of the work.
So, you see I’m not just sitting on the back patio getting drunk. I’m being literary. (God bless you Ernest Hemingway.)
After a couple of hours I decided to go get something to
eat. Fortunately there is a local
convenience store a ten-minute stagger from the house.
I studied the menu board by the sandwich counter carefully
looking in vain for an Italian sub. Well, fine, I thought, they have a bunch of
cold cuts. They could improvise. Actual
conversation with sandwich lady:
Me: I want
something like an Italian sub.
Sandwich Lady: We have Italian subs.
Me: Well then,
that would work.
Of course, this being central Pennsylvania I was required to
specify provolone over American, but the sandwich was quite good (as you will
usually find in PA) and hit the spot.
Back at the house, I had had enough of the Michelob Ultra for the evening and wanted something else. Now, my father doesn’t really drink (he’s not as “literary” as I am apparently), but for the occasional wine or beer, but he is of that generation of men for whom a perfectly acceptable (if not outright expected) holiday gift was a bottle of whiskey.
And that, my friends, is why they call it “The Greatest Generation.”
Among his collection was a bottle of Canadian Club that had already been opened. The label read “aged 6 years.” More like 26 I’d guess but it had a fine, familiar aroma. Naturally the house was not well stocked with mixers, but there is always some ginger ale on hand which meant I had the makings of a fine whiskey highball. Now all I needed was ice.
No ice. The ice maker in the freezer was empty. The ice cube trays were empty. What kind of insanity was this? I felt as if I’d been brutally shorn of the trappings of civilization, standing there as my ancient ancestors must have with little more than bear skins, crude flint tools, and a bottle of aged Canadian Club blended whiskey.
But no, I would not allow circumstances to strip me of my humanity. I went to college, after all. I had an education. I’d think of something.
I left out the ice.
Later my father came home and turned on the icemaker (I never said I was an “A” student) and a short while later I heard the familiar “plunkety-plunk-plunk” and had ice for my last drink of the evening.
How did my basement expedition go the next day? Well, In Part 2, I’ll have some of the items
I found, but for now I will point out with no small measure of pride that I
successfully polished off the last of the justifiably maligned Michelob
Ultra. “Our long national nightmare is
over” my brother texted me.
Indeed it was. And yet another one was just beginning.
He had bought some Rolling Rock too.
J.
June 22, 2007 at 09:42 AM in Weekend Leisure | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack
June 13, 2007
We Can Fool Them All Again
Sung to the tune of The Who’s “Won’t Get Fooled Again.”
We’ll be dealing in the aisles
With the lobbyists all smiles
And the morals we campaigned on will be gone
And the voters who spurred us on
Will have gone home, been long gone
They decided so now we get to sing the song
We’ll tip our hat to the old constitution
Act like we’re part of a new revolution
Smile and grin at the sameness all around
Pick up our phones for pay
Just like yesterday
Then we’ll get down on our knees and pray
We can fool them all again
The change would never come
We knew it all along
We’ve got campaigns to fund, that’s all
And the world looks just the same
And history ain’t changed
Cause the donors we need all the more
We’ll tip our hat to the old constitution
Act like we’re part of a new revolution
Smile and grin at the sameness all around
Pick up our phones for pay
Just like yesterday
Then we’ll get down on our knees and pray
We can fool them all again
Yes, yes!
We’ll move our ethics and our principles aside
If they happen to be left half alive
We’ll get our earmarks and smile at the sky
‘Cause we know that the subsidized never cry
Do ya?
There’s nothing in the these sheets
Looks different to me
Just the names have been replaced, by-the-bye
And the crying from the left
Is now crying from the right
And the earmarks have all grown larger overnight
We’ll tip our hat to the old constitution
Act like we’re part of a new revolution
Smile and grin at the sameness all around
Pick up our phones for pay
Just like yesterday
Then we’ll get down on our knees and pray
We can fool them all again
Yes, yes!
Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss
J.
June 13, 2007 at 02:48 PM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack
June 04, 2007
an apple a day keeps obama away
As part of an effort to address critics who claim that he
lacks substance, presidential candidate Barack Obama laid out a broad and
detailed universal health care plan last week that embodied two key
innovations:
- Tax the rich
- Give stuff away for free.
While it is not clear how traditional Democrats will feel
about this bold departure from party orthodoxy, his plan was well received by
supporters, few of whom are rich and most of whom really like getting stuff for
free.
Part of the funding for his plan will come from government-mandated cost efficiencies because when you think “cost efficiency” you think, “United States federal government.”
With these efficiencies in place, the plan is projected to
cost between $50 and $65 billion per year. While such estimates are notoriously difficult to make, it is probably a
safe bet that it will take at least a couple years for that amount to
double.
The plan does not mandate that everyone purchase health
insurance, but rather assumes, according to the Senator’s aides, that “everyone
would buy health insurance if it were affordable enough.” The fact that between one-quarter and
three-quarters of all those currently not insured could in fact afford to
purchase health insurance but choose not to seems to have escaped their notice. But it’s perfectly understandable given that the
thought that anyone would make a decision other than the one they would make is
beyond comprehension. It’s as if most of
the public doesn’t even know who Michael Moore is!
Perhaps the biggest innovation of the Obama plan would be a
focus on prevention: “Preventive care only works if Americans take personal
responsibility for their health and make the right decisions in their own lives
– if they eat the right foods, stay active, and stop smoking.”
And in order for Americans to make the “right decisions for
their own lives,” they must first be told what those “right” decisions are. And then make those right decisions. For
themselves, of course (It’s still a free country!). In this way, the decision
of what to have for dinner, often a chaotic affair of individual desires,
unique circumstances, and free will is elevated from a purely self-indulgent personal
choice to an act of national policy.
In other words, if you have the french fries, the terrorists
win.
To further the making of these right decisions, “healthy
environments” will be encouraged such as “local grocery stores with fruits and
vegetables.”
Fruits and vegetables? In grocery stores?
It’s so crazy it just might work.
What if Barack Obama wins the presidency and implements his
plan? Our projected timeline:
2010: Universal Health Care Established. Public service announcements urge Americans to eat more fruits and vegetables.
2011: Costs unexpectedly outrun expectations. Taxes are
raised to support increased expenditures but only on the “top 30% wealthiest
Americans.” The consumption of fruit and
vegetables is further encouraged though a combination of public service
announcements and the mandate that businesses pay 5% of their wages directly in
fresh produce (with the exception of corn, which due to government ethanol
requirements now goes for $1 a kernel on the burgeoning black market).
2012: Additional taxes are raised to support continually increasing program costs, but only on the “top 55% wealthiest Americans.” Police are empowered to set up traffic stops to search vehicles for unauthorized pastries.
2012: Having easily won re-election against a GOP torn apart over the independent candidacies of John McCain of the “John McCain Party,” Rudy Giuliani of the “Anti-Ferret Party,” and Jenna Bush of the “Party Party,” President Obama denounces the increasing grumbling about high health care taxes as a perfect example of the greed and avarice of the “top 75% wealthiest Americans.”
2014: A hospital in West Chicago paints the walls in its waiting room for the first time since profit caps were put in place. Patients approve noting that, “it’s like the months just fly by now.” Restaurants begin implementing a recently enacted law that requires they only serve dessert to patrons who finish all their vegetables first.
2015: While the “top 90% wealthiest Americans” struggle under a crushing tax burden, the Obama administration works frantically to reduce health care costs by enacting the “Hat & Mittens” law making it a felony to go outside in the winter improperly attired lest you “catch cold.”
2017: President Obama is succeeded by his former Vice President, Jose Ortiz, a beneficiary of the 2011 McCain-Kennedy Immigration Reform Act that extended American citizenship to all Mexicans and Central Americans including those still living in Mexico and Central America. At his inauguration, President Ortiz pledges to fulfill his campaign promise of bringing fiscal health back to the country’s universal health care program and begins by leading the country in its newly mandatory daily calisthenics and vegetable colonics…
June 4, 2007 at 11:48 AM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack
June 02, 2007
define “problem.”
According to the experts at Alcoholics Anonymous, I do not have a drinking problem:
Have you ever decided
to stop drinking for a week or so but only lasted a couple of days?
No: I have never
decided to stop drinking.
Do you wish people
would mind their own business about your drinking --- stop telling you what to
do?
No: Fortunately,
it’s very hard to tell someone what to do when they are passed out.
Have you ever
switched from one kind of drink to another in the hope that this would keep you
from getting drunk?
No: I have never
wanted to keep from getting drunk.
Do you ever need a
drink to get started in the morning or to stop shaking?
No: I’m usually
still pretty buzzed from the night before.
Do you envy people
who can drink without getting into trouble?
No: It’s hard to
get in trouble when you sit in your kitchen alone getting drunk. Why, is that a problem?
Have you ever had
problems connected with drinking during the past year?
Yes: I ran out of
gin once.
Has your drinking
caused trouble at home?
Yes: That time I
ran out of gin.
Do you ever try to
get “extra” drinks at a party because you don’t get enough?
No: I only go to
parties where I know I’ll get enough.
Do you tell yourself
you can stop drinking anytime you want to even though you keep getting drunk
when you don’t mean to?
No: I always mean
to get drunk.
Have you ever missed
days of work or school because of drinking?
No: If I don’t go
to work, I can’t afford to buy gin.
Do you have
blackouts?
No: I remember everything. It’s a curse.
Have you ever felt
your life would be better if you did not drink?
Now you’re just talking crazy talk.
RESULTS:
“Thanks for taking our quiz.
You answered yes to 2 questions.
People who answered yes four or more
times are probably in trouble with alcohol. If you think you may have a problem
with alcohol, see your doctor right away.”
Science: Is there anything it can’t justify?
J.
June 2, 2007 at 01:24 PM in Weekend Leisure | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack




