October 13, 2011
Let Freedom Ring! However, You’re Going To Need a Permit For The Bell. – October 2011 Edition
“Let Freedom Ring! However, You’re Going To Need a Permit For The Bell,” is a periodic series in which we explore the new and exciting ways in which the notions of freedom and liberty are being interpreted in our modern and progressive world.
Displaying the American Flag For a Banquet Being Held at a Local Restaurant.
OUT: Patriotic.
IN: Disruptive.
When 80-year-old Marti Warren attempted to bring an American flag into an Oxford, Alabama Olive Garden for a planned Kiwanis Club banquet, alert restaurant employees moved quickly to stop her in order to:
“Avoid disrupting the dining experience for all other guests.”
But for their quick thinking, imagine the mayhem that might have ensued had Ms. Warren succeeded in displaying the American flag, what with its provocative stars and inflammatory stripes. No doubt the unfamiliar textile, which the club had planned to be the object of some kind of allegiance “pledge” would have resulted in the complete breakdown of the social order tearing at the very fabric of our cultural bonds and making it really hard to get that order for Venetian Apricot Chicken in anything like a reasonable amount of time.
Setting up a Haunted House in Your Neighborhood
OUT: A delightful treat for the local kids and a harmless way to build community spirit and help collect money for charity.
IN: Code violation.
For six years the Stelle family has spent the weeks before Halloween creating a haunted house in their Freemont, California neighborhood and together with friends and neighbors have managed to put on a frightfully good time for local children.
That is why Freemont officials have ordered it destroyed.
Apparently, the Stelle family forgot to get a permit to build the haunted house partly because it never occurred to them they needed a permit to build a haunted house. What is the building code for a haunted house, anyway? Does it have to be Werewolf accessible? Provide ample broom parking? Be nondiscriminatory towards all ghosts regardless of whether or not they’re friendly?
That is unclear, but what is clear is that the Stelles and their co-conspirators have six days to comply with Freemont haunted house ordinances and tear the terrifyingly unpermitted structure down.
It’s for the children, you know.
Aging TV Star Makes Increasingly Bizarre and Outrageous Comments in Public.
OUT: Look on in pity in hopes she gets the help she needs.
IN: Give her a new TV series.
Roseanne Barr made some news last week when she suggested that bankers who refused to turn more of their private property over to the government should be beheaded. Some have suggested she was only joking, and come to think of it, an avowed socialist appearing on a Russian television program suggesting bringing back the Guillotine to execute the bourgeois is quite the knee slapper. In fact, so much so, that NBC has decided to pick up her new sitcom, “Downwardly Mobile,” in which the multi-millionaire actress will play a woman living in a trailer park.
Being Told by Bureaucrats That You Have to Tear Down Your Children’s Tree House
OUT: Using the opportunity to teach your children the importance of questioning the mercurial nature of power as wielded by the state.
IN: Using the opportunity to teach your children the importance of unquestioning obedience to the mercurial nature of power as wielded by the state.
After having built an elaborate tree house in his yard, Mark Grapin was informed that he should have gotten a permit to build the tree house as it is considered an “addition,” and further, since it was technically in his “front” yard (he lives on a corner lot) he couldn’t’ get one anyway and must tear the tree house down. Having already lost one appeal, Mr. Grapin has one chance left. Asked what he would tell his kids if he loses, the distraught dad said what many a patriot has said before when confronted with the petty tyranny of the state:
“Daddy makes mistakes. We tried our best. I made a mistake by not knowing enough.”
It’s like Thomas Paine reincarnated.
J.
October 13, 2011 at 05:09 PM in Let Freedom Ring! | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack
September 21, 2011
Let Freedom Ring! However, You’re Going To Need a Permit For The Bell. – Law Enforcement Edition
“Let Freedom Ring! However, You’re Going To Need a Permit For The Bell,” is a periodic series in which we explore the new and exciting ways in which the notions of freedom and liberty are being interpreted in our modern and progressive world.
Defending Your Family by Shooting a Grizzly Bear
OLD: Hero.
NEW: Criminal.
An Idaho man last month shot a grizzly bear that had wandered into his yard, threatening his wife and two of his children.
If you are like most American parents, you have only one question:
Was the bear okay?
Unfortunately, the bear died, and the man, Jeremy Hill, was subsequently charged with violating the Endangered Species Act. No charges were brought against the bear as human children populations are abundant throughout the Pacific Northwest.
While Mr. Hill initially faced up to a year in jail and $50,000 in fines, he eventually agreed to pay a $1,000 fine and pled guilty to not waiting for federal agents to come shoot the bear, as any law-abiding citizen should do. We mean, any law abiding widower left to raise his surviving children on his own.
Defending Yourself And Your Coworkers by Facing Down Armed Robbers.
OLD: Hero.
NEW: Unemployed
A Michigan pharmacist found himself face to face with two armed gunmen as he worked the night shift at a Walgreens in Benton Township, Michigan. Staring down the barrel of a gun and fearing for his life, the pharmacist, Jeremy Hoven, clearly cracked under the pressure, completely forgetting his employer’s non-escalation policy, however remembering his firearms training and drew his permitted hand gun, shooting at the robbers and forcing them to flee.
Given that Walgreen’s policy is that “compromise is safer," a policy typically arrived at when you are doing something other than looking down the barrel of a gun (such as sitting safely in your corporate office), the company fired Hoven.
Let that be a lesson to you out there. Particularly to you armed robbers.
Minding Your Own Business
OLD: A time honored American tradition.
NEW: A crime.
The trouble started when a number of people living in rural Antelope Valley, California, were found to be not bothering anyone. Concerned by this blatant regard for others, Los Angeles County formed “Nuisance Abatement Teams” to address the non-growing problem.
Given the inherent danger involved in confronting people with a history of keeping to themselves and the natural hazards involved in any building code enforcement action, these NATs swarm homes with armed agents, the better to ensure no one tries to run to the bathroom and bring the place up to code (perhaps by installing a GFI, or maybe putting in a vapor barrier).
As a result of these actions, we hope Los Angeles can finally get a handle on these “public nuisance conditions on private property," in the middle of nowhere.
Being Tied up While Your Place is Ransacked
OLD: A crime
NEW: A law enforcement action.
A strip club in Edinburg, Texas was raided by forty law enforcement officers who tied up everyone inside while they searched the place for drugs.
While they did not find any drugs, they did find $1,500 in cash, $8,000 in club “tokens,” the manager’s wallet, laptops, tablet computers, and backpacks and decided to take those instead.
They really didn’t have any choice given the fact that there were no drugs to take.
These items are being held indefinitely as evidence, presumably for the crime of “intent to carry a wallet,” and “possession of cash.”
J.
September 21, 2011 at 09:01 PM in Let Freedom Ring! | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack
August 25, 2011
Let Freedom Ring! However, You’re Going To Need a Permit For The Bell.
Welcome to the inaugural edition of “Let Freedom Ring! However, You’re Going To Need a Permit For The Bell,” a periodic series in which we explore the new and exciting ways in which the notions of freedom and liberty are being interpreted today.
Rescuing a Baby Woodpecker.
OLD: An act of kindness.
NEW: A Violation of the Federal Migratory Bird Act.
An eleven-year-old girl came to the rescue of a baby woodpecker that was about to become a meal for her father’s cat. Not being able to find the bird’s mother, but still fearing for the bird’s safety, she and her mother took it upon themselves to care for the bird until it was ready to be released, a true example of both independent initiative and selflessness, indeed the very embodiment of the American spirit.
And that’s where the trouble started.
Confronted a short while later by a Fed with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the small girl and her mother were informed that they were in violation of the federal Migratory Bird Act. While they released the bird safely a short while later they were visited a couple of weeks later by the same Fed who had caught them, this time accompanied by an armed state trooper (hey, the little girl was now a known felon). The mother was issued a $535 fine and told she could face up to a year in jail.
You know what they say, “Don’t be kind, if you can’t do the time.”
Later, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said it was all a crazy misunderstanding and that they had never intended to issue the fine, send one of their officials, request armed escort, or threaten the mother with a year in jail in front of her terrified daughter.
Oops.
The lesson? If you really care about endangered migratory bird species, just let the cat eat the bird next time.
Tearing Down Your Old Chain Link Fence.
OLD: Sprucing up your property.
NEW: Removing an important contextual clue to the original occupants of the neighborhood.
Wanting to improve her property, a homeowner in Alexandria Virginia replaced a dilapidated chain link fence with a brand new black aluminum fence. When zoning officials came out to the property to check on an unrelated matter, they noticed the missing chain link fence. They were aghast, asking if it could be recovered and reinstalled, thus returning the property to its historically important rundown roots:
"While many feel that [chain-link] fences have negative connotations, this material has played an important role in the development of mid-century vernacular housing and their cultural landscape.... By eradicating this 'simple fencing solution,' the applicant would be removing an important contextual clue to the original occupants of this neighborhood."
We’ll be honest, we did not consider what important role historical preservationists might think our stained fifty-year-old Formica counter tops might have played in our neighborhood’s cultural landscape when we renovated the kitchen. (Best guess: “Tacky.”)
At the moment at least, the homeowner is being allowed to keep her new fence, however we suggest she find other ways to celebrate her mid-century vernacular housing, such as parking on the front lawn. Sure, parking on your front lawn may have negative connotations, but this “simple parking solution,” will ensure the important contextual clues to the original occupants will be preserved. (Even more so, if she can find mid-century cinder blocks for the wheels.)
Collecting Antiquities
OLD: A harmless hobby that edifies and delights.
NEW: A violation of The Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act.
The Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act addresses the very real problem inherent in the belief that property belongs to people who purchased it, rather than people who did not. The forced transfer of property from people who own it to people who don’t is called “repatriation,” however you are cautioned not to try to “repatriate” your neighbor’s wallet, as that would be considered theft. The difference? Shut up, that’s the difference.
Most recently, a judge dismissed a case brought by a Missouri-based nonprofit that had attempted to import coins originally minted in China and Cyprus which had been purchased in London, but which were seized by U.S. Customs under an agreement with Cyprus and China forbidding the importation of coins from their countries.
“Wait,” you are probably saying to yourself, “Cyprus is a country?” Also, “If they bought the coins in London, what’s the problem?
The problem is they couldn’t prove the coins origin. (We would guess China and Cyprus.) When it comes to deciding between the interests of American citizens, and complying with agreements which they were not party to made by executive order with foreign nations, we’re going to have to assume the Americans are guilty until proven innocent.
J.
August 25, 2011 at 04:02 PM in Let Freedom Ring! | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack

